the movie was about copyright issues and the problems with creating new art. new art is influenced by the past is ''off limits" by copy right laws.
Bias is shown in this story by using many different rhetorical question trying to use them to change our perspective and prove a point. the show shows both point of views because it shows how copyrighting is illegal and shows how it isn't illegal and how some people can get out of it but most artist that enforce this law are very anal about it, to the point that the charge little girls for two songs.
The movie shows both sides of copyright ,it shows the anecdote "the women downloads a couple songs and gets fined over $1000000" shows how copyright infringement can happen to just anybody. I think that shows girl talks bias on copyright infringement . the analogy "the past can control the future" shows how copyright is illegal on once you make something and you want to keep it as yours, you copyright it so nobody else can use it without you getting money for it.
I think the movie shows both biases of copyright infringement, and I think its wrong to a certain extent.
